What are the experimentally determined MIC99 values (for the known antibiotics) against each of the bacterial strains used?

write a report that gives a clear presentation of your results (MICs, graphs, tables etc) and how these results compare to values published in the literature (Discussion). Please include an appropriate list of references (cited using the Harvard referencing style).

The report must address the following questions. What are the experimentally determined MIC99 values (for the known antibiotics) against each of the bacterial strains used? How do these compare to published MIC99 values in the scientific literature? How does this experimental methodology compare to other approaches to antibacterial testing? How do the results of the two types of extraction (aqueous and organic) compare in terms biological activity against each of the bacterial strains used?
———-
Added on 27.10.2015 17:26
you do not have to write introduction and methods JUST Results and Discussion. I have sent what they should include. T he natural product I was working in is Cinamon I made an organic extraction of it and did the experiment to see the effectiveness of it as natural antibiotic with known antibiotics. Involves screening
I uploaded the methods and what we did in the lab to help you take an idea.
In the 96-well plate
Raw 1 is a negative control (DMSO (solvent) +media, 2 is the positive (DMSO+microbe).
we start from number 3B organic extraction and make serial dilution to number 12
3C Polymixin and then make serial dilution to number 12 and do the same for the rest
3D Ampicillin
3E Vacanomycin
3F Chlormaphenicol
3G Isoniazid
3H Aqueous extraction for black papper ( do not search sources about this product Just explain the result I mean black papper )

Plate 1 is Escherichia coli
2-Staphylococcus epidermis
3-Mycobacterium smegmatis