Human Resource Management – Case Study

Order Description

This order is for an excellent PhD level writer who is an expert in Human Resource Management.

CASE STUDY INSTRUCTIONS
NOTE: THIS IS A PHD LEVEL PAPER AND THE WORK MUST REFLECT SUCH.
TEXTBOOK
Gomez-Mejia, L. R., Balkin, D. B., & Cardy, R. L. (2016). Managing human resources (8th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education. ISBN: 9780133029697.
Instructions for the Case Study may be found below. The response must be at least 3 pages (not including the title and reference pages), double-spaced, and in current APA format. Each assignment must include a title page and a reference page. Use scholarly sources, the course textbook, and biblical integration.

Criteria
All key components of the Case Study prompts are answered.
There is a clear, logical flow to the assignment.
Major points are stated clearly.
A title page is included.
A references page is included.
At least 6 scholarly sources (plus the textbook) are included.
Clear and relevant biblical integration is included.
A thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting concepts) is included.
Proper spelling and grammar are used.
Required page count (at least 3 pages, not including the title and references pages) is met, and the assignment is double-spaced and in current APA format (title page, citation formatting, reference page & formatting of references, headers, etc.)
Brings clarity to issues being discussed and relates issues to the textbook and scholarly sources.

Make note that the textbook, scholarly sources, and the Bible are required in the paper.

Case Study (see upload)
This case involves a fictitious company, D-Bart Industries, formed by the merger of Davis Manufacturing and Bartlund Technologies, 2 former rivals in the fabrication of precision parts used in medical equipment and airline manufacturing. The exercise requires analysis and application of various strategies utilized during downsizing and the use of performance appraisals in the decision-making process.
Thoroughly answer the 2 main questions for discussion posed at the end of the case study (p. 7).
1. What should Howell do? How should D-Bart make reduction decisions when performance appraisal documents are inaccurate?

2. How can D-Bart improve its performance appraisal process?
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order