NOTE: THIS IS A PHD LEVEL PAPER AND THE WORK MUST REFLECT SUCH. THE SENIOR EDITOR MUST EDIT/PROOFREAD THE WORK BEFORE UPLOADING THE PAPER.
Instructions for the Case Study may be found below. The response must be at least 3 pages (not including the title and reference pages), double-spaced, and in current APA format. Each assignment must include a title page and a reference page. Use scholarly sources, the course textbook, and biblical integration.
All key components of the Case Study prompts are answered.
There is a clear, logical flow to the assignment.
Major points are stated clearly.
A title page is included.
A references page is included.
At least 6 scholarly sources (plus the textbook) are included.
Clear and relevant biblical integration is included.
A thoughtful analysis (considering assumptions, analyzing implications, comparing/contrasting concepts) is included.
Proper spelling and grammar are used.
Required page count (at least 3 pages, not including the title and references pages) is met, and the assignment is double-spaced and in current APA format (title page, citation formatting, reference page & formatting of references, headers, etc.)
Brings clarity to issues being discussed and relates issues to the textbook and scholarly sources.
Make note that the textbook, scholarly sources, and the Bible are required in the paper.
Case Study (see upload)
This case study is focused on how 2 different companies use total rewards to support the organizations\’ missions and values and achieve strategic outcomes. Select only 1 of the companies as the basis for your case study response. (This is not meant to be a comparison of the companies but an exploration of how 2 different companies use their compensation and benefits structures to achieve organizational outcomes). The paper must specifically address the following areas:
How the company uses its own products or services to enhance the total compensation for its employees;
The internal and external strengths and weaknesses identified and how the company responded to these factors from a total rewards perspective;
Examples of traditional and non-traditional rewards and how they are used to meet organizational objectives;
How the company aligns its benefits with its corporate values; and
Recommendations regarding an expansion of the benefits programs offered at the company that would further align HR with the accomplishment of organizational goals and values.
1. Do not use the case questions as the headings in your case assignments. Rather, format the headings in APA format.
2. Fully answer the questions posed.
3. If you are unsure about what constitutes a scholarly source conduct a search online to gather additional information. It is very important that post-graduate students practice supporting their opinions/analysis/evaluation with validated, reliable, peer-reviewed scholarly research. To date, this is the most common error causing point deductions in the assignments (as well as not including the course textbook and Biblical integration). The scholarly sources add credibility to your analysis.
Simply using the library databases does not guarantee a source is scholarly. You must actually ensure it is peer-reviewed, contains primary research, and includes all of the cited sources/references that author(s) utilized for the research. Scholarly research will not be .com, .gov, .edu, .org sites. Scholarly research will not be simply a few pages in length. Typically, scholarly research articles are significantly lengthy and include the methods of the research utilized, the analysis and recommendations for future research. Scholarly research will not be magazine or newspaper articles. Scholarly research will always be peer-reviewed by scholarly \’peers\’ in the field of research discussed in the article. Just because an article is in a periodical with the word \’journal\’ does not guarantee it is scholarly.
Currently 2 writers are viewing this order