Devise a plan to investigate the validity of patients’ claims of denial of services.
this is a paper and these are the criterias
| Points: 200 | Assignment 3: Legal Ethics, Patients’ Rights, and HIV / AIDS | |||
| Criteria | Unacceptable
Below 70% F |
Fair
70-79% C |
Proficient
80-89% B |
Exemplary
90-100% A |
| 1. Devise a plan to investigate the validity of patients’ claims of denial of services. This plan should include, but not be limited to, establishing mechanisms to address service denial claims, a human resources component, and a review of related policies and procedures.
Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely devised a plan to investigate the validity of patients’ claims of denial of services. Did not submit or incompletely included, but did not limit to, establishing mechanisms to address service denial claims, a human resources component, and a review of related policies and procedures. | Partially devised a plan to investigate the validity of patients’ claims of denial of services. Partially included, but did not limit to, establishing mechanisms to address service denial claims, a human resources component, and a review of related policies and procedures. | Satisfactorily devised a plan to investigate the validity of patients’ claims of denial of services. Satisfactorily included, but did not limit to, establishing mechanisms to address service denial claims, a human resources component, and a review of related policies and procedures. | Thoroughly devised a plan to investigate the validity of patients’ claims of denial of services. Thoroughly included, but did not limit to, establishing mechanisms to address service denial claims, a human resources component, and a review of related policies and procedures. |
| 2. Analyze the primary way in which different staffing levels may play pivotal roles in upholding ethical conduct, including treating patients with dignity. Justify your position.
Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely analyzed the primary way in which different staffing levels may play pivotal roles in upholding ethical conduct, including treating patients with dignity. Did not submit or incompletely justified your position. | Partially analyzed the primary way in which different staffing levels may play pivotal roles in upholding ethical conduct, including treating patients with dignity. Partially justified your position. | Satisfactorily analyzed the primary way in which different staffing levels may play pivotal roles in upholding ethical conduct, including treating patients with dignity. Satisfactorily justified your position. | Thoroughly analyzed the primary way in which different staffing levels may play pivotal roles in upholding ethical conduct, including treating patients with dignity. Thoroughly justified your position. |
| 3. Formulate a plan to relate the primary legal ramifications to the professional staff regarding ethical treatment of the hospital’s HIV / AIDS patients.
Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely formulated a plan to relate the primary legal ramifications to the professional staff regarding ethical treatment of the hospital’s HIV / AIDS patients. | Partially formulated a plan to relate the primary legal ramifications to the professional staff regarding ethical treatment of the hospital’s HIV / AIDS patients. | Satisfactorily formulated a plan to relate the primary legal ramifications to the professional staff regarding ethical treatment of the hospital’s HIV / AIDS patients. | Thoroughly formulated a plan to relate the primary legal ramifications to the professional staff regarding ethical treatment of the hospital’s HIV / AIDS patients. |
| 4. Devise a community relations plan that tout’s the hospital’s unique ways of serving persons with HIV / AIDS, including a focus on de-stigmatizing those afflicted.
Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely devised a community relations plan that tout’s the hospital’s unique ways of serving persons with HIV / AIDS, including a focus on de-stigmatizing those afflicted. | Partially devised a community relations plan that tout’s the hospital’s unique ways of serving persons with HIV / AIDS, including a focus on de-stigmatizing those afflicted. | Satisfactorily devised a community relations plan that tout’s the hospital’s unique ways of serving persons with HIV / AIDS, including a focus on de-stigmatizing those afflicted. | Thoroughly devised a community relations plan that tout’s the hospital’s unique ways of serving persons with HIV / AIDS, including a focus on de-stigmatizing those afflicted. |
| 5. 5 references
Weight: 5% |
No references provided | Does not meet the required number of references; some or all references poor quality choices. | Meets number of required references; all references high quality choices. | Exceeds number of required references; all references high quality choices. |
| 6. Writing Mechanics, Grammar, and Formatting
Weight: 5% |
Serious and persistent errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. | Partially free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. | Mostly free of errors in grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. | Error free or almost error free grammar, spelling, punctuation, or formatting. |
| 7. Appropriate use of APA in-text citations and reference section
Weight: 5% |
Lack of in-text citations and / or lack of reference section. | In-text citations and references are provided, but they are only partially formatted correctly in APA style. | In-text citations and references are error free or almost error free and consistently formatted correctly in APA style. | |
| 8. Information Literacy / Integration of Sources
Weight: 5% |
Serious errors in the integration of sources, such as intentional or accidental plagiarism, or failure to use in-text citations. | Sources are mostly integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. | Sources are consistently integrated using effective techniques of quoting, paraphrasing, and summarizing. | |
| 9. Clarity and Coherence of Writing
Weight: 5% |
Information is confusing to the reader and fails to include reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. | Information is partially clear with minimal reasons and evidence that logically support ideas. | ||
joyce
0
