Describe the background of the problem. Tell the story of the issue and why it deserves attention.

Order Description
Section A: Problem Description

Due Date: May 03, 2017

Details:
Write a paper of 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page) on your proposed problem description for your EBP project. The paper should address the following:
1. Describe the background of the problem. Tell the story of the issue and why it deserves attention.
2. Identify the stakeholders/change agents. Who or what organizations are concerned about, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. List the interested parties, patients, students, agencies, Joint Commission, etc.
3. Provide the PICOT question. (PICOT: Population-Intervention-Comparison-Outcome-Timeframe). Make sure that the question fits with your graduate degree specialization.
4. State the purpose and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. The objective should address what is to be gained. This is a restatement of the question, providing focus. Measurements need to be taken before and after the evidence-based practice is introduced to identify the expected changes.
5. Provide supportive rationale that the problem or issue is an important one for nursing to resolve using relevant professional literature sources.
Develop an initial reference list to ensure that there is adequate literature to support your evidence-based practice project. Follow the \”Steps to an Efficient Search to Answer a Clinical Question\” box in chapter 3 of the textbook. Refer to the \”Search Method Example\” as the format in which to compile this data.
1. The majority of references should be research articles. However, national sources such as Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), National Center for Health Statistics (NCHS), Department of Health and Human Resources (HHS), or the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) and others may be used when you are gathering statistics to provide the rationale for the problem.
2. Once you get into the literature, you may find there is very little research to support your topic and you will have to start all over again. Remember, in order for this to be an evidence-based project, you must have enough evidence to introduce this as a practice change. If you find that you do not have enough supporting evidence to change a practice, then further research would need to be conducted.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required for the individual sections, but is required for the final paper.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section A for your final paper submission.
HCA699.R.SearchMethod_student.docx or use method example below:

Search Method Example
Search Method
A comprehensive electronic search was completed using the following databases:
Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials
Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews
National Guideline Clearinghouse
CINAHL
Ovid
Medline

The search included English-only published articles between 1990 and 2005.
Key words used in the search were:
Pediatric asthma education
Self-management
Self-monitoring
Grade school children
Systematic reviews
Randomized controlled trials

Search results revealed 75 publications. The abstracts were screened and 10 studies were relevant to pediatric asthma education involving self-management, self-monitoring behaviors, self-efficacy, and educational programs with various interventions. These studies included three systematic reviews, five randomized control trials (RCT), one cohort descriptive study, and one qualitative study. Refer to Appendix A for a complete reference list.

Apply Rubrics
Applied Rubric Section A: Problem Description
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00% 3
Satisfactory
88.00% 4
Good
92.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Problem Description Holistic Assessment
100.0 %Problem Description — Describe the background of the problem. Identify the stakeholders/change agents and list the interested parties. Provide the PICOT question. State the purpose and project objectives in specific, realistic, and measurable terms. Develop an initial reference list. No discernible problem description and/or objectives are provided The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally addressed. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are not addressed or are minimally addressed. Work reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Initial reference list is missing. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Work addresses the problem description and objectives but not all components. Alignment is difficult to discern. The problem is not in the correct format. Objectives are lacking measurement or may be ambiguous; The problem selection rationale is not addressed or minimally introduced with no supporting details. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are listed. Work displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information, and develops only a partial initial reference list. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Problem description and objectives are stated but may not be fully developed or aligned. The problem is in the PICOT format but not appropriately developed. Objectives are measurable but may be ambiguous. The problem selection rationale is present but the significance is unclear. Expected changes are briefly introduced. Work exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information, and develops an initial reference list. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Problem description and objectives are presented and tie together, and identify the stakeholders/change agents, who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. The problem is in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable. The problem selection is justified using literature. Expected changes are outlined. An initial reference list is developed. Work demonstrates integrative and accurate comprehension and applies information as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Problem description and objectives are presented in detail and align, and describe the stakeholders/change agents, who or what organizations are concerned, may benefit from, or are affected by this proposal. The problem is in the PICOT format and developed appropriately. Objectives are measurable. The problem selection is justified using literature and supportive examples, not just based on the most current evidence. Expected changes before and after the evidence-based practice are integrated. Work develops an initial reference list, demonstrates clarity and specificity of comprehension, and synthesizes all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
100 %Total Weightage

Section B: Literature Support

Due Date: May 10, 2017 23:59:59

Details:
To begin, work through the reference list that was created in the Problem Description Assignment in Topic 2. Appraise each resource using the \”Rapid Critical Appraisal Checklists\” available in the textbook appendix. The specific checklist you use will be determined by the type of evidence within the resource.
Develop a research table to organize and summarize the research studies. Using a summary table allows you to be more concise in your narrative description. Only research studies used to support your intervention are summarized in this table. Refer to the \”Evaluation Table Template\” available in the textbook appendix or use the \”Evaluation Table Template\” resource as an adaptable template.
Write a narrative of 750-1,000 words (not including the title page and references) that presents the research support for the project\’s problem and proposed solution. Make sure to include:
1. Description of the search method (i.e., databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit your criteria).
2. Summarization of all of the research studies used as evidence. The essential components of each study need to be described so that readers can evaluate its scientific merit, including study strengths and limitations.
3. Description of the validity of the internal and external research.
It is essential to make sure that the research support for the proposed solution is sufficient, compelling, relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journal articles.
Although you will not be submitting the checklist information or the evaluation table you design in Topic 3 with the narrative, the checklist information and evaluation table should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required for the individual sections, but is required for the final paper.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section B for your final submission.
HCA699.R.EvaluationTable_student.docx or use table below:

Evaluation Table Template
Authors/Year of Citation Research Design Data Collection Methods Sample Characteristics Key Findings

Column headings are suggestions only; table can be adapted as needed.
Apply Rubrics
Applied Rubric Section B: Literature Support
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00% 3
Satisfactory
88.00% 4
Good
92.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Literature Support Holistic Assessment
100.0 %Literature Support Summarize the research support for the project\’s problem and proposed solution. Describe the search method. Summarize all of the research studies used as evidence. Describe research strengths and limitations as well as the validity of the internal and external research. Provides sufficient, compelling, relevant research from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work lists (a) the individual research support for the project\’s problem and proposed solution without an in-depth explanation, and (b) the search method data without details. Analysis of the research strengths and limitations is not outlined or is outlined poorly. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Work lists (a) the individual research support for the project\’s problem and proposed solution without an in-depth explanation, and (b) lists the search method data identifying some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work ignores or superficially evaluates the research strengths, and limitations, and draws unwarranted conclusions. The research support may not be relevant and/or may not be from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Work provides a basic overview of the individual research support for the project\’s problem and proposed solution, and minimally includes any rationale, details and/or examples of the validity of the internal and external research. Work lists the search method data identifying some but not all of the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work conducts a surface level of evaluation of the research strengths and limitations. Very narrow conclusions are provided. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Work provides a complete summary of the individual research support for the project\’s problem and proposed solution in a concise manner, and describes (a) the validity of the internal and external research providing some detailed rationale, and (b) the search method identifying the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work analyzes the research strengths and limitations and provides direct, competent, and appropriate conclusions. The research support is relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work demonstrates integrative and accurate comprehension and applies information as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of the subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Work provides a detailed summary of the individual research support for the project\’s problem and proposed solution emphasizing the essential components, and describes (a) the validity of the internal and external research in-depth, and (b) the search method identifying the databases, keywords, criteria for inclusion and exclusion, and number of studies that fit the criteria. Work thoughtfully analyzes and evaluates the research strengths and limitations, drawing warranted conclusions. The research support is sufficient, compelling, relevant and from peer-reviewed professional journals. Work demonstrates clarity and specificity of comprehension and synthesizes all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
100 %Total Weightage

Section C: Solution Description

Due Date: May 17, 2017 23:59:59
Details:
Write a paper of 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page) paper for your proposed evidence-based practice project solution. Address the following criteria:
Proposed Solution
Describe the proposed solution (or intervention) for the problem and the way(s) in which it is consistent with current evidence. Heavily reference and provide substantial evidence for your solution or intervention.
Consider if the intervention may be unrealistic in your setting, too costly, or there is a lack of appropriate training available to deliver the intervention. If it is, you may need to go back and make changes to your PICOT before continuing.
Organization Culture
Explain the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources.
Expected Outcomes
Explain the expected outcomes of the project. The outcomes should flow from the PICOT.
Method to Achieve Outcomes
Develop an outline of how the outcomes will be achieved. List any specific barriers that will need to be assessed and eliminated. Make sure to mention any assumptions or limitations which may need to be addressed.
Outcome Impact
Describe the impact the outcomes will have on one or all of the following indicators: quality care improvement, patient-centered quality care, efficiency of processes, environmental changes, and/or professional expertise.
Paper Guidelines
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required for the individual sections, but is required for the final paper.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section C for your final submission.
Apply Rubrics
Applied Rubric Section C: Solution Description
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00% 3
Satisfactory
88.00% 4
Good
92.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Solution Description Holistic Assessment
100.0 %Solution Description — Describe the proposed solution (or intervention). Explain the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources. Explain the expected outcomes of the project. Develop an outline of how the outcomes will be achieved. List any specific barriers that will need to be assessed and eliminated. Describe the impact the outcomes will have. Proposed solution does not align with or is not supported with research. Alignment is difficult to discern with the organization or community culture and resources. Expected outcomes are ambiguous or missing; Basic outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is missing essential data or incomplete. The impact the outcomes will have is not present with any type of detail. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Proposed solution is presented but not with all components. Alignment is difficult to discern with the organization or community culture and resources. Expected outcomes are ambiguous. Basic outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is missing essential data. The impact the outcomes will have may or may not be present with any type of detail. Work displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Proposed solution is presented but needs to be connected to research. Proposed solution alignment with the organization or community culture and resources is briefly mentioned. Expected outcomes are listed. A basic outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is developed. Work broadly describes the impact the outcomes will have and exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Proposed solution is presented, consistent with current evidence and briefly addresses the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources, limited details and examples. Appropriate conclusions are drawn. There is minimal explanation of the expected outcomes. Work develops an outline of how the outcomes will be achieved, broadly describes the impact the outcomes will have, and demonstrates integrative and accurate comprehension and applies information as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Proposed solution is presented in detail, consistent with current evidence, is heavily supported by evidence, and explains the way(s) in which the proposed solution is consistent with the organization or community culture and resources, providing details and examples. Warranted conclusions are drawn. The expected outcomes are explained in-depth. A detailed outline of how the outcomes will be achieved is developed. Work describes the impact the outcomes will have on one or all of the following indicators (as appropriate): quality care improvement, patient-centered quality care, efficiency of processes, environmental changes, and/or professional expertise. Work demonstrates clarity and specificity of comprehension and synthesizes all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
100 %Total Weightage

Section D: Change Model

Due Date: May 24, 2017 23:59:59

Details:
Roger\’s Diffusion of Innovation theory is a particularly good theoretical framework to apply to an EBP project. However, students may also choose to use change models, such as Duck\’s Change Curve Model or the Transtheoretical Model of Behavioral Change. Other conceptual models presented such as a utilization model (Stetler\’s model) and EBP models (the Iowa Model and ARCC Model) can also be used as a framework for applying your evidence-based intervention in a health care setting.
In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page), apply a change model to the implementation plan.
1. Apply one of the above models and carry your implementation through each of the stages, phases, or steps identified in the chosen model.
2. In addition, create a conceptual model of the project. Although you will not be submitting the conceptual model you design in Topic 5 with the narrative, the conceptual model should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required for the individual sections, but is required for the final paper.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Sections D for your final submission.
ply Rubrics
Applied Rubric Section D: Change Model
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00% 3
Satisfactory
88.00% 4
Good
92.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Change Model Holistic Assessment
100.0 %Change Model– Apply a change model to the implementation plan. Carry the implementation plan through each of the stages, phases, and/or steps identified in the chosen model. Work loosely connects the implementation plan to a change model and reveals inaccurate comprehension of material and lacks the ability to apply information. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Work loosely connects the implementation plan to the chosen change model. Identification, interpretation and evaluation of the change model are not presented comprehensively and/or may be ambiguous at times Work displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Interpretation and evaluation of the change model are not presented comprehensively and may be ambiguous at times. Work provides a basic description of the implementation plan through the stages, phases, and/or steps identified in the chosen model. Work exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Analysis and evaluation draw warranted use of the specified change model, and rationale is appropriately supported. Work provides a detailed outline of the implementation plan through each of the stages, phases, and/or steps identified in the chosen model. Individual interpretation on the effectiveness of the model in relation to the implementation plan is presented but lacks depth. Work demonstrates integrative and accurate comprehension and applies information as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Analysis and evaluation draw warranted use of the specified change model, and rationale is appropriately supported. Work provides a detailed descriptive narrative of the implementation plan through each of the stages, phases, and/or steps. Solid interpretation of the change model in relation to the implementation plan is provided, as is appropriate evaluation of the effectiveness of the model. Work demonstrates clarity and specificity of comprehension and synthesizes all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
100 %Total Weightage

Section E: Implementation Plan

Due Date: May 24, 2017 23:59:59

Details:
In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page) provide a description of the methods to be used to implement the proposed solution. Include the following:
1. Describe the setting and access to potential subjects. If there is a need for a consent or approval form, then one must be created. Although you will not be submitting the consent or approval form(s) in Topic 5 with the narrative, the consent or approval form(s) should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
2. Describe the amount of time needed to complete this project. Create a timeline. Make sure the timeline is general enough that it can be implemented at any date. Although you will not be submitting the timeline in Topic 5 with the narrative, the timeline should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
3. Describe the resources (human, fiscal, and other) or changes needed in the implementation of the solution. Consider the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Provide a resource list. Although you will not be submitting the resource list in Topic 5 with the narrative, the resource list should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
4. Describe the methods and instruments, such as a questionnaire, scale, or test to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Develop the instruments. Although you will not be submitting the individual instruments in Module 5 with the narrative, the instruments should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
5. Explain the process for delivering the (intervention) solution and indicate if any training will be needed.
6. Provide an outline of the data collection plan. Describe how data management will be maintained and by whom. Furthermore, provide an explanation of how the data analysis and interpretation process will be conducted. Develop the data collection tools that will be needed. Although you will not be submitting the data collection tools in Module 5 with the narrative, the data collection tools should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
7. Describe the strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges.
8. Establish the feasibility of the implementation plan. Address the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, presentation development). Make sure to provide a brief rationale for each. Develop a budget plan. Although you will not be submitting the budget plan in Module 5 with the narrative, the budget plan should be placed in the appendices for the final paper.
9. Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is not required for the individual sections, but is required for the final paper.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section E for your final submission.
Apply Rubrics
Applied Rubric Section E: Implementation Plan
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
80.00% 3
Satisfactory
88.00% 4
Good
92.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
5.0 %Setting and Subjects Does not fully describe the organizational setting and/or access to potential subjects. Information is ambiguous and leaves the audience questioning. Presents some characteristics of the organizational setting but leaves essential data out. Outlines the access to potential subjects but the information is not developed or comprehensive Lists the characteristics of the organizational setting and outlines the access to potential subjects. Minimal use of examples and details is present. Presents a detailed outline of the organizational setting and access to potential subjects. Examples are provided. Presents a comprehensive description of the organizational setting and access to potential subjects. Specific and relevant examples and details are in-depth and expanded upon.
5.0 %Timeline Presents inadequate organization and/or development of the amount of time needed to complete the project. A basic timeline is present without detail. Insufficient details are provided. An outline of the amount of time needed to complete the project is present but may be inconsistent. Some facts are detailed while a few are missing. An outline of the amount of time needed to complete the project is present. Important components are give adequate attention and detail. Effective organization contributes to the full development and presentation of the amount of time needed to complete the project. Essential components within the project are specified.
15.0 %Solution Process and Resources Gives vague and/or incomplete description of the human, fiscal, and other resources and process for delivering the (intervention) solution. More than one major component of the criteria is missing. One of the following may be missing or inadequate: Lists the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the implementation of the solution. Identifies with minimal detail the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Outlines the process for delivering the (intervention) solution. Lists the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the implementation of the solution. Identifies with minimal detail the clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Outlines the process for delivering the (intervention) solution. Provides some detail although limited. Presents a detailed outline of the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the implementation of the solution. Supplies the rationale for any clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Explains the process for delivering the (intervention) solution. Information is accurate, appropriate, and integrated effectively. Presents a full detailed in-depth description of the human, fiscal, and other resources needed for the implementation of the solution. Presents specific detail and rationale for any clinical tools or process changes that would need to take place. Explains the process for delivering the (intervention) solution, outlining each step. Demonstrates an understanding of the principles and elements and reflects a sophisticated understanding of the subject knowledge. Information is accurate, appropriate, and integrated effectively.
10.0 %Solution methods and instruments Gives vague and/or incomplete the methods and instruments to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Lists the methods and instruments to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Comprehensive alignment and details are missing. Presents a general description of the methods and instruments to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Details are present. Provides a clear, specific outline of how/why/which methods and instruments are to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Provides additional information on instrument strengths and weaknesses. Provides a clear, specific description of how/why/which methods and instruments are to be used for monitoring the implementation of the proposed solution. Provides additional information on possible alternative methods as well as instrument strengths and weaknesses.
20.0 %Data Collection and Management Presents inadequate data collection and management system. The major points of the data analysis and interpretation process are ambiguous or missing. No strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges have been presented. A limited data collection and management system is described. One of the following is inadequate or missing: Basic outline of the major points of the data analysis and interpretation process is present. Lists strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges. Some examples and details are used. A limited data collection and management system is described. Basic outline of the major points of the data analysis and interpretation process is present. Lists strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges. Some examples and details are used. An adequate data collection and management system is outlined with some detail. Presents detailed description of the major points of the data analysis and interpretation process. Outlines appropriate strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges. Examples and details are used throughout. Presents a comprehensive detailed outline of the data collection plan. Describes in-depth how the data management will be maintained Thoroughly describes the major points of the data analysis and interpretation process. Formulates appropriate strategies to deal with the management of any barriers, facilitators, and challenges. Examples and details are used throughout.
10.0 %Budget Significant information is missing from the budget or the budget is not provided. Does not clearly specify in the budget how funds will be used. Projected costs in the budget are unrelated to the implementation of the project. Presents a broad general explanation of the budget. Projected costs in the budget do not reflect realistic amounts for implementing the project. At least half of the criteria below is present: Addresses the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, presentation development). Presents a brief rationale for each. Addresses most areas of the budget, but lacks some details. Gives a general explanation in the budget narrative of how the funds will be used. Projected costs in the budget do not reflect realistic amounts for implementing the project. The majority of the criteria below is present: Addresses the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, presentation development). Presents a brief rationale for each. Contains a comprehensive outline of the budget information for the entire project. Explains how the funds will be used. Projected costs in the budget are reasonable. Addresses the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, presentation development). Presents a brief rationale for each. Contains complete budget information for the entire project. Explains in detail how the funds will be used. Projected costs in the budget are reasonable Provides detailed and convincing budget narrative justifying costs. Addresses the costs for personnel, consumable supplies, equipment (if not provided by the institute), computer related costs (librarian consultation, database access, etc.), and other costs (travel, presentation development). Presents a brief rationale for each.
5.0 %Describe the plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation Description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation lacks critical data. Description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is minimal. Details are lacking. Surface level description of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation is offered. Claims and ideas of the criteria are supported. Presents direct, competent, and appropriate analysis of plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation. Outlines in detail if goals were met, effectiveness and quality of the solution, and further recommendations. Provides examples and details. Thoughtfully analyzes, evaluates, and describes plans to maintain, extend, revise, and discontinue a proposed solution after implementation. Supports rationale. Describes in detail if goals were met, effectiveness and quality of the solution, and further recommendations. Provides examples and details throughout.
20.0 %Organization and Effectiveness
7.0 %Thesis Development and Purpose Paper lacks any discernible overall purpose or organizing claim. Thesis and/or main claim are insufficiently developed and/or vague; purpose is not clear. Thesis and/or main claim are apparent and appropriate to purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are clear and forecast the development of the paper. It is descriptive and reflective of the arguments and appropriate to the purpose. Thesis and/or main claim are comprehensive. The essence of the paper is contained within the thesis. Thesis statement makes the purpose of the paper clear.
8.0 %Argument Logic and Construction Statement of purpose is not justified by the conclusion. The conclusion does not support the claim made. Argument is incoherent and uses noncredible sources. Sufficient justification of claims is lacking. Argument lacks consistent unity. There are obvious flaws in the logic. Some sources have questionable credibility. Argument is orderly, but may have a few inconsistencies. The argument presents minimal justification of claims. Argument logically, but not thoroughly, supports the purpose. Sources used are credible. Introduction and conclusion bracket the thesis. Argument shows logical progressions. Techniques of argumentation are evident. There is a smooth progression of claims from introduction to conclusion. Most sources are authoritative. Clear and convincing argument that presents a persuasive claim in a distinctive and compelling manner. All sources are authoritative.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
10.0 %Format
5.0 %Paper Format (Use of appropriate style for the major and assignment) Template is not used appropriately or documentation format is rarely followed correctly. Appropriate template is used, but some elements are missing or mistaken. A lack of control with formatting is apparent. Appropriate template is used. Formatting is correct, although some minor errors may be present. Appropriate template is fully used. There are virtually no errors in formatting style. All format elements are correct.
5.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage

Section F: Evaluation

Due Date: May 31, 2017 23:59:59

Details:
In 500-750 words (not including the title page and reference page) develop an evaluation plan to be included in your final evidence-based practice project. Provide the following criteria in the evaluation, making sure it is comprehensive and concise:
1. Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data.
2. Describe the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives are achieved.
3. Describe how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability.
4. Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results.
5. Describe implications for practice and future research.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are required to submit this assignment to Turnitin. Please refer to the directions in the Student Success Center.
Upon receiving feedback from the instructor, refine Section F for your final submission.
Apply Rubrics
Applied Rubric Section F: Evaluation
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00% 3
Satisfactory
88.00% 4
Good
92.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
100.0 %Evaluation Holistic Assessment
100.0 %Evaluation — Develop an evaluation plan. Describe the rationale for the methods used in collecting the outcome data, the ways in which the outcome measures evaluate the extent to which the project objectives were achieved, and how the outcomes will be measured and evaluated based on the evidence. Address validity, reliability, and applicability. Describe strategies to take if outcomes do not provide positive results and the implications for practice and future research. Evaluation plan presents the method used in the measurement of the outcomes but does not align the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. Modification strategies as well as the impact for future research may or may not be present with minimal details. Subject matter is absent, inappropriate, and/or irrelevant. Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Evaluation plan presents the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and/or evidence. The rationale is missing. The information presented is ambiguous. Modification strategies as well as the impact to future research may or may not be present with minimal details. Work displays a lack of comprehension but attempts to apply information. There is weak, marginal coverage of subject matter with large gaps in presentation. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented may lack cohesiveness and details. Work lists possible project modifications when outcomes do not provide expected results, broadly describes the implications for practice and future research, and exhibits comprehension of the material and clearly attempts to integrate and apply information. All subject matter is covered in minimal quantity and quality. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Evaluation plan presents the rationale for and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. Validity, reliability, and applicability are briefly addressed. Work outlines strategies for project modification when outcomes do not provide expected results, broadly describes the implications for practice and future research, and demonstrates integrative and accurate comprehension and applies information as appropriate. There is comprehensive coverage of subject matter. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Evaluation plan presents the rationale and the methods used in the measurement of the outcomes according to the project objectives and evidence. The information presented is aligned, comprehensive, and addresses validity, reliability, and applicability. The plan formulates clear and precise strategies for project modification when outcomes do not provide expected results. Work develops and explains an informed position on the implications for practice and future research and demonstrates clarity and specificity of comprehension and synthesizes all relevant information. Coverage extends beyond what is needed to support subject matter. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
100 %Total Weightage

Evidence-Based Practice Presentation

Due Date: Jun 07, 2017

Details:
Develop a presentation no longer than 10-12 minutes, with comprehensive speaker\’s notes, that covers all of the major areas of your proposal.
While APA format is not required for the body of this assignment, solid academic writing is expected, and in-text citations and references should be presented using APA documentation guidelines, which can be found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
Post your Evidence-Based Practice Presentation to the Main Forum in Topic 8 as directed by the instructor for class discussion and peer feedback.
Apply Rubrics
Applied Rubric Evidence-Based Practice Presentation
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less than Satisfactory
80.00% 3
Satisfactory
88.00% 4
Good
92.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
40.0 %Presentation Subject Knowledge Does not demonstrate knowledge of the concept or its role. Fails to identify the impact of the proposal in practice. Demonstrates minimal knowledge of the subject. Does not adequately introduce the proposal. Does not justify the impact of the proposal in practice. Demonstrates a moderate knowledge of the subject. Introduces the basic outline of the proposal. Does not fully describe the impact of the proposal in practice. Demonstrates good knowledge of the subject. Describes the proposal plan. Justifies some of the impact of the proposal in practice. Demonstrates a full and deep knowledge of the proposal subject. Develops and explains the proposal components. Accurately presents the impact of the proposal in practice.
30.0 %Content The content lacks a clear point of view and logical sequence of information. Includes little persuasive information. Sequencing of ideas is unclear. The content is vague in conveying a point of view and does not create a strong sense of purpose. Includes some persuasive information. The presentation is generally competent, but ideas may show some inconsistency in organization and/or in their relationships to each other. The content is written with a logical progression of ideas and supporting information, exhibiting a unity, coherence, and cohesiveness. Includes persuasive information from reliable sources. The content is written clearly and concisely. Ideas universally progress and relate to each other. The presentation includes motivating questions and advanced organizers. The presentation gives the audience a clear sense of the main idea.
10.0 %Presentation
10.0 %Layout The layout is cluttered, confusing, and does not use spacing, headings, and subheadings to enhance the readability. The text is extremely difficult to read with long blocks of text, small point size for fonts, and inappropriate contrasting colors. Poor use of headings, subheadings, indentations, or bold formatting is evident. The layout shows some structure, but appears cluttered and busy or distracting with large gaps of white space or a distracting background. Overall readability is difficult due to lengthy paragraphs, too many different fonts, dark or busy background, overuse of bold, or lack of appropriate indentations of text. The layout uses horizontal and vertical white space appropriately. Sometimes the fonts are easy to read, but in a few places the use of fonts, italics, bold, long paragraphs, color, or busy background detracts and does not enhance readability. The layout background and text complement each other and enable the content to be easily read. The fonts are easy to read and point size varies appropriately for headings and text. The layout is visually pleasing and contributes to the overall message with appropriate use of headings, subheadings, and white space. Text is appropriate in length for the target audience and to the point. The background and colors enhance the readability of the text.
20.0 %Format
10.0 %Language Use and Audience Awareness (includes sentence construction, word choice, etc.) Inappropriate word choice and lack of variety in language use are evident. Writer appears to be unaware of audience. Use of primer prose indicates writer either does not apply figures of speech or uses them inappropriately. Some distracting inconsistencies in language choice (register) and/or word choice are present. The writer exhibits some lack of control in using figures of speech appropriately. Language is appropriate to the targeted audience for the most part. The writer is clearly aware of audience, uses a variety of appropriate vocabulary for the targeted audience, and uses figures of speech to communicate clearly. The writer uses a variety of sentence constructions, figures of speech, and word choice in distinctive and creative ways that are appropriate to purpose, discipline, and scope.
5.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Slide errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Slides are largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. Writer is clearly in control of standard, written academic English.
5.0 %Evaluating and Documenting Sources (in-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, references page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) Contains no title slide, no references section, and no correctly cited references within the body of the presentation. Title slide is incomplete or inaccurate. References section includes sources, but many citation errors. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with many errors. Title slide has minor errors. References section includes sources, but they are not consistently cited correctly. Citations are included within the body of the presentation but with some errors. Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources with minimal errors. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation. Title slide is complete. References section includes correctly cited sources. Correct citations are included within the body of the presentation.
100 %Total Weightage

Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper

View Rubric
Due Date: Jun 07, 2017 23:59:59
Details:
Throughout this course you will be developing a formal, evidence-based practice proposal.
The proposal is the plan for an evidence-based practice project designed to address a problem, issue, or concern in the professional work setting. Although several types of evidence can be used to support a proposed solution, a sufficient and compelling base of support from valid research studies is required as the major component of that evidence. Proposals are submitted in a format suitable for obtaining formal approval in the work setting. Proposals will vary in length depending upon the problem or issue addressed, but they should be between 3,500 and 5,000 words. The cover sheet, abstract, references page, and appendices are not included in the word count.
Section headings and letters for each section component are required. Responses are addressed in narrative form in relation to that number. Evaluation of the proposal in all sections is based upon the extent to which the depth of content reflects graduate-level critical-thinking skills.
This project contains six formal sections:
1. Section A: Problem Description
2. Section B: Literature Support
3. Section C: Solution Description
4. Section D: Change Model
5. Section E: Implementation Plan
6. Section F: Evaluation of Process
Each section (A-F, to be completed in Topics 1-5) will be submitted as separate assignments so your instructor can provide feedback for revision (refer to each Topic for specific assignments).
The final paper will consist of the completed project (with revisions to all sections), title page, abstract, reference list, and appendices. Appendices will include a conceptual model for the project, handouts, data and evaluation collection tools, a budget, a timeline, resource lists, and approval forms.
Refer to the \”EBP Implementation Plan Guide, the \”Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Format,\” and the \”Evidence-Based Practice Project Student Example\” as tools for developing your proposal.
Prepare this assignment according to the APA guidelines found in the APA Style Guide, located in the Student Success Center. An abstract is required for the final paper.
This assignment uses a rubric. Please review the rubric prior to beginning the assignment to become familiar with the expectations for successful completion.
You are not required to submit this assignment to Turnitin.
HCA699.R.EBPimplementationPlanGuide_student.docx
HCA699.R.EvidenceBasedPracticeProjectProposalFormat_student.docx
HCA699.R.EBPStudentExample_student.docx
EBP Implementation Plan Guide(Link 1)
PICOT Question
Topic 1
Preliminary Checkpoint Identify a health care issue you want to see change.
Understand the culture of the organization in its readiness for EBP implementation.
Develop PICOT question.
Build EBP knowledge and skills. Notes:
Topic 2
Checkpoint 1 Define project purpose.
Who are the stakeholders for your project?
Identify active (on the implementation team) and supportive (not on the team, but essential to success) roles.
Identify project team roles and leadership.
Begin acquisition of any necessary approvals for project implementation and dissemination (e.g., system leadership, unit leadership, ethics board [IRB]).
Feasibility: Briefly integrate the evidence with stakeholder influence to inform evidence-based recommendations.
Hone PICOT question. Notes:
Topic 3
Checkpoint 2 Conduct literature search and retain studies that meet criteria for inclusion.
Connect with librarian.
Critically appraise literature.
Summarize evidence with focus on implications for practice. Notes:
Topic 4
Checkpoint 3 Begin formulating a detailed plan for implementation of evidence.
Include who must know about the project, when they will know, how they will know.
Connect the evidence and the project.
Identify and address known barriers and facilitators of project.
Define post-project outcome indicators of a successful project. Notes:
Topic 5
Checkpoint 4 Define baseline data collection source(s) (e.g., existing data set, electronic health record), methods, and measures.
Identify resources (human, fiscal, and other) necessary to complete project.
Gather outcome measures.
Write data collection protocol.
Write the project protocol (data collection fits in this document).
Finalize any necessary approvals for project implementation and dissemination (e.g., system leadership, unit leadership, IRB). Notes:
Topic 6
Checkpoint 5 Finalize protocol for implementation of evidence.
Complete final data collection for project evaluation.
Include specific plan for how the evaluation will take place: who, what, when, where and how, and communication mechanisms to stakeholders. Notes:
Topic 7
Checkpoint 6 Complete proposal.
Develop proposal presentation. Notes:
Topic 8
Checkpoint 7 Present proposal.
Review proposals, addressing new questions generated from process of the peer review. Notes:

Adapted from Melnyk, B. M., & Fineout-Overholt, E. (Eds.). (2010). Evidence-based practice in nursing & healthcare: A guide to best practice (2nd ed.). Philadelphia, PA: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

Evidence-Based Practice Project Proposal Format (Link 2)
Use the following format and headings when constructing your final evidence-based practice project proposal paper.

1) Title page
2) Abstract (Minimum of 350 words)
a) Contains project title, project directors name, and affiliation.
b) Presents a complete concise overview of all phases of the proposed project.
3) Section A: Problem Description
4) Section B: Literature Support
5) Section C: Solution Description
6) Section D: Change Model
7) Section E: Implementation Plan
8) Section F: Evaluation
9) Appendices
a) Critical Appraisal Checklists
b) Evaluation Table
c) Conceptual Models
d) Timeline
e) Resource List
f) Proposal Instruments
g) Data Collection Tool
h) Budget
i) Optional
i) Approval Forms
ii) Handouts
iii) Evaluation Tools

Apply Rubrics
Applied Rubrics Evidence-Based Practice Proposal Final Paper
1
Unsatisfactory
0.00% 2
Less Than Satisfactory
65.00% 3
Satisfactory
75.00% 4
Good
85.00% 5
Excellent
100.00%
70.0 %Content
10.0 %Abstract presents a complete overview of all phases of the proposed project. There is no abstract An abstract, minimally written, is clearly not sufficient to provide the reader with an understanding of the project. The abstract provides an overview of part of the project, but lacks detail. The abstract provides a overview of all phases of the proposed project but it is too brief. The abstract contains the project title, project directors name, and affiliation. The abstract provides a complete, concise overview of all phases of the proposed project and flows well with the rest of the paper. The abstract contains the project title, project directors name, and affiliation.
25.0 %Project /Content Comprehension Content is incomplete or omits most of the requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Project/Content does not demonstrate an understanding of the basic principles and does not demonstrate critical thinking and analysis of the overall program subject. Content is incomplete or omits some requirements stated in the assignment criteria. Project/Content demonstrates shallow understanding of the basic principles. Within section revisions, components may be missing details, only a surface level of evaluation is offered, methods are described but flawed or unrealistic, and strategies are discussed, but coverage is incomplete. Content is complete, but somewhat inaccurate and/or irrelevant. Project/Content demonstrates adequate understanding of the basic principles. The major sections have had revisions but some components may be missing details. Reasonable but limited inferences and conclusions are drawn but lack development. Supporting research is adequate. Content is comprehensive and accurate, and definitions are clearly stated. Sections form a cohesive logical and justified whole. All of the major sections have been revised based upon logical feedback, conclusions, and sound research. Paper shows careful planning and attention to details and illuminates relationships. Research is adequate, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Content is comprehensive. Project/Content presents ideas and information beyond that presented throughout the course, and substantiates their validity through solid, academic research where appropriate. Research is thorough, current, and relevant, and addresses all of the issues stated in the assignment criteria. Final paper exhibits the process of creative thinking and the development of the proposal. It applies a framework of knowledge and practice. All of the major sections have been revised based upon logical feedback, conclusions, and sound research. Paper shows careful planning and attention to how disparate elements fit together.
20.0 %Sections A-G Synthesis The main sections are not easily identified, and some of the subconcepts do not successfully integrate to form a cohesive whole. Within section revisions, methods and strategies are described poorly. Basic descriptions, connections, and alignment are not clearly presented. Logic flow is random, not easily understood. The main sections are somewhat identified, and some of the subconcepts branch appropriately from the main sections. Basic descriptions, connections, and alignment, as well as a clear logic flow, are somewhat fragmented, not easily understood. All of the main sections are easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main sections. There are links among sections, but some connections may be ambiguous. Basic descriptions, connections and alignment as well as basic logic flow are understandable, but are somewhat lacking in a clear progression. All of the main sections are easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main sections. Descriptions, connections, and alignments are provided. Logic flow is smooth and easily understood, facilitating a thorough understanding of the various sections as they interrelate. All of the main sections are easily identified, and subconcepts branch appropriately from the main sections. Descriptions, connections, and alignments are obvious and well supported. Logic flow is smooth and easily understood, facilitating a thorough understanding of the various sections as they interrelate. Connections to extraneous materials are well documented and integrated.
15.0 %Appendices Several of the appendices are missing. Designs are not neat or organized, and do not include all required elements. Appendices are unprofessionally developed. Several of the appendices are missing. Design detracts from purpose. The work is not neat and includes minor flaws or omissions of required elements. Limited understanding of the topic is present as evidenced by the design. All of the appendices have been provided. Design is fairly clean, with a few exceptions. Appearance is general, and major elements are missing. Appendices provide minimal details. Appendices are appropriate for the audience and the content but some of the development of the material is inadequate. Basic understanding of the topic is present as evidenced by the design. All of the appendices have been provided. Designs are appropriate and present quality products. Appearance is generally neat, with a few minor flaws or missing elements. Appendices provide details with accuracy and reveals a solid understanding of the topic as evidenced by the design. All of the appendices have been provided. They are effective and functional. The work is well presented and includes all required elements. The overall appearance is neat and professional. Appendices provide sufficient detail with precision and specificity. Appendices reveal a solid understanding of the topic as evidenced by the design.
15.0 %Mechanics
15.0 %Mechanics of Writing (includes spelling, punctuation, grammar, language use) Surface errors are pervasive enough that they impede communication of meaning. Inappropriate word choice and/or sentence construction are used. Frequent and repetitive mechanical errors distract the reader. Inconsistencies in language choice (register), sentence structure, and/or word choice are present. Some mechanical errors or typos are present, but are not overly distracting to the reader. Correct sentence structure and audience-appropriate language are used. Prose is largely free of mechanical errors, although a few may be present. A variety of sentence structures and effective figures of speech are used. Writer is clearly in command of standard, written, academic English.
70.0 %Research
15.0 %Research Citations (In-text citations for paraphrasing and direct quotes, and reference page listing and formatting, as appropriate to assignment and style) No reference page is included. No citations are used. Reference page is present. Citations are inconsistently used. Reference page is included and lists sources used in the paper. Sources are appropriately documented, although some errors may be present. Reference page is present and fully inclusive of all cited sources. Documentation is appropriate and citation style is usually correct. In-text citations and a reference page are complete and correct. The documentation of cited sources is free of error.
100 %Total Weightage
Currently 1 writers are viewing this order

Place a similar order with us or any form of academic custom essays related subject and it will be delivered within its deadline. All assignments are written from scratch based on the instructions which you will provide to ensure it is original and not plagiarized. Kindly use the calculator below to get your order cost; Do not hesitate to contact our support staff if you need any clarifications.

Type of paper Academic level Subject area
Number of pages Paper urgency Cost per page:
 Total:

Whatever level of paper you need – college, university, research paper, term paper or just a high school paper, you can safely place an order.


Last Completed Projects

# topic title discipline academic level pages delivered
6
Writer's choice
Business
University
2
1 hour 32 min
7
Wise Approach to
Philosophy
College
2
2 hours 19 min
8
1980's and 1990
History
College
3
2 hours 20 min
9
pick the best topic
Finance
School
2
2 hours 27 min
10
finance for leisure
Finance
University
12
2 hours 36 min