Create a schema that supports the company’s business and processes.
Project Deliverable 3: Database and Data Warehousing Design
Due Week 5 and worth 110 points
This assignment consists of two (2) sections: a design document and a revised project plan. You must submit both sections as separate files for the completion of this assignment. Label each file name according to the section of the assignment it is written for. Additionally, you may create and / or assume all necessary assumptions needed for the completion of this assignment.
The use of specific software has been suggested however equivalents including but not limited to OpenOffice, Dia, and Open Project are also permitted. If equivalent tools are used, files must be saved and submitted for grading using extensions that are readable by their equivalent Microsoft Windows edition. Assignment submissions that fail to follow this request may result in a reduced grade.
One of the main functions of any business is to be able to use data to leverage a strategic competitive advantage. This feat hinges upon a company’s ability to transform data into quality information. The use of relational databases is a necessity for contemporary organizations; however, data warehousing has become a strategic priority due to the enormous amounts of data that must be analyzed along with the varying sources from which data comes. Since you are now the CIO of a data-collection company which gathers data by using Web analytics and operational systems, you must design a solution overview that incorporates data warehousing. The executive team needs to be clear about what data warehousing can provide the company.
Section 1: Design Document
- Write a four to six (4-6) page design document in which you:
- Support the need for data warehousing within your company and elaborate on the best practices that the company will adhere to.
- Create a schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. Note: The minimum requirement for the schema should entail the tables, fields, relationships, views, and indexes.
- Create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix. Explain your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.
- Create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length but must be included in the design document appendix.
- Illustrate the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. The diagram must map data between source systems, data warehouses and specified data marts. The diagram should map data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. Note: The graphically depicted solution is not included in the required page length.
Section 1 of your assignment must follow these formatting requirements:
- Be typed, double spaced, using Times New Roman font (size 12), with one-inch margins on all sides; citations and references must follow APA or school-specific format. Check with your professor for any additional instructions.
- Include a cover page containing the title of the assignment, the student’s name, the professor’s name, the course title, and the date. The cover page and the reference page are not included in the required assignment page length.
- Include charts or diagrams created in MS Visio or Dia as an appendix of the design document. All references to these diagrams must be included in the body of the design document.
Section 2: Revised Project Plan
Use Microsoft Project to:
- Update the project plan fromProject Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks.
The specific course learning outcomes associated with this assignment are:
- Summarize how information systems represent a key source of competitive advantage for organizations.
- Develop information systems-related activities to maximize the business value within and outside the organization.
- Use technology and information resources to research issues in information systems.
- Write clearly and concisely about strategic issues and practices in the information systems domain using proper writing mechanics and technical style conventions.
Grading for this assignment will be based on answer quality, logic / organization of the paper, and language and writing skills, using the following rubric.
Points: 110 |
Project Deliverable 3: Database and Data Warehousing Design |
||||
Criteria |
Unacceptable Below 60% F |
Meets Minimum Expectations 60-69% D |
Fair 70-79% C |
Proficient 80-89% B |
Exemplary 90-100% A |
Section 1: Project Introduction | |||||
1a. Support the need for data warehousing within your company and elaborate on the best practices that the company will adhere to.
Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely supported the need for data warehousing within your company; did not submit or incompletely elaborated on the best practices that the company will adhere to. | Insufficiently supported the need for data warehousing within your company; insufficiently elaborated on the best practices that the company will adhere to. | Partially supported the need for data warehousing within your company; partially elaborated on the best practices that the company will adhere to. | Satisfactorily supported the need for data warehousing within your company; satisfactorily elaborated on the best practices that the company will adhere to. | Thoroughly supported the need for data warehousing within your company; thoroughly elaborated on the best practices that the company will adhere to. |
1b. Create a schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Explain and support the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure.
Weight: 20% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Did not submit or incompletely explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. | Insufficiently created a schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Insufficiently explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. | Partiallycreated a schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Partially explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. | Satisfactorilycreated a schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Satisfactorily explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. | Thoroughlycreated a schema that supports the company’s business and processes. Thoroughly explained and supported the database schema with relevant arguments that support the rationale for the structure. |
1c. Create an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Explain your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram.
Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Did not submit or incompletely explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. | Insufficiently created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Insufficiently explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. | Partially created an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Partially explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. | Satisfactorilycreated an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Satisfactorily explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. | Thoroughlycreated an Entity-Relationship (E-R) Diagram relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. Thoroughly explained your rationale behind the design of your E-R Diagram. |
1d. Create a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia.
Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. | Insufficiently created a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. | Partiallycreated a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. | Satisfactorilycreated a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. | Thoroughlycreated a Data Flow Diagram (DFD) relating the tables of your database schema through the use of graphical tools in Microsoft Visio or an open source alternative such as Dia. |
1e. Illustrate the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. The diagram must map data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts.
Weight: 15% |
Did not submit or incompletely illustrated the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. Did not submit or incompletely mapped data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. | Insufficiently illustrated the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. Insufficiently mapped data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. | Partiallyillustrated the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. Partially mapped data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. | Satisfactorilyillustrated the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. Satisfactorily mapped data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. | Thoroughlyillustrated the flow of data including both inputs and outputs for the use of a data warehouse. Thoroughly mapped data between source systems, data warehouses, and specified data marts. |
Section 2: Revised Project Plan | |||||
2. Update the project plan fromProjectDeliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks.
Weight: 5% |
Did not submit or incompletely updated the project plan fromProject Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. | Insufficiently updated the project plan from ProjectDeliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. | Partially updated the project plan fromProject Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. | Satisfactorily updated the project plan fromProjectDeliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. | Thoroughly updated the project plan fromProject Deliverable 2: Business Requirements, with three to five (3-5) new project tasks each consisting of five to ten (5-10) sub-tasks. |
3. Clarity, writing mechanics, and formatting requirements
Weight: 10% |
More than 8 errors present | 7-8 errors present | 5-6 errors present | 3-4 errors present | 0-2 errors present |
