Do props help children answer questions about touching?

Discussion 2: Children as Eyewitnesses

In the mid-1980s, the U.S. news media reported on a number of disturbing cases in which allegations of child sexual abuse had been made against well-respected community members. One of the most famous cases involved the McMartin family, owners of a preschool in California. The investigation began when a mother reported to the police that her son had been abused by Ray McMartin, a male teacher at the school.

Throughout the course of the investigation, the police conducted several hundred interviews of children along with their parents, all current and former clients of the preschool. Allegations ranged from inappropriate touching of children to children being forced to engage in oral and anal sex. Even more bizarre were claims made by some young “victims” that they were sexually attacked in secret tunnels underneath the school. Equally startling were allegations that the McMartins mutilated animals and forced the youngsters to touch their corpses. At the end of the criminal investigation, the police arrested four family members and three teachers (PBS Online, 1998).

Even for a trained professional, eliciting accurate details from an adult eyewitness badly shaken by the ordeal of witnessing a crime can be a formidable task. For example, the use of a weapon can unnerve an adult witness to such an extent that the likelihood that he or she can accurately recall details of an assailant’s features decreases significantly. Now imagine the daunting task faced by a detective assigned to interview a six-year-old alleging the heinous crime of child sexual abuse. Costanzo and Kraus (2015) cite research that found that memories of children are “negatively impacted by a stress-inducing interview style” (p. 144). This finding calls into question the reliability and accuracy of information elicited from a child during an interview dealing with such a delicate subject. Moreover, other researchers found children are particularly vulnerable to suggestibility when responding to interview questions posed by an adult.

Reference:
PBS Online (1998). Innocence lost the plea. Retrieved from: https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/pages/frontline/shows/innocence/etc/other.html

To prepare for this Discussion:

Review Chapter 7 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology. Focus on children as eyewitnesses, and consider the reliability of eyewitness testimony from children.
Review Chapter 11 in your course text, Forensic and Legal Psychology. Focus on the particular problems faced by interviewers questioning children regarding sexual abuse.
Review the articles, “Forensic Interviewing Aids: Do Props Help Children Answer Questions About Touching?” and “Wailing Babies in Her Wake.” Focus on issues related to the accuracy of eyewitness testimony from children.
Consider the degree to which children can provide reliable eyewitness testimony.

With these thoughts in mind:

Post by Day 4 your position on the degree to which children can provide reliable eyewitness testimony. Justify your response with at least one reference to a peer-reviewed article from the Walden Library and at least one reference to the Learning Resources. Be sure to cite references in APA format.

Read a selection of your colleagues’ postings.

Respond by Day 6 to postings from at least two of your fellow group members in one or more of the following ways:

Share an insight from having read your colleague’s posting.
Offer and support an opinion.
Make a suggestion.
Expand on your colleague’s posting.

Return to this Discussion in a few days to read the responses to your initial posting. Note what you have learned and/or any insights you have gained as a result of the comments your colleagues made.

Readings

Costanzo, M., & Krauss, D. (2015). Forensic and legal psychology: Psychological science applied to the law (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Worth Publishers.
Chapter 7, “Eyewitness Identification and Testimony”
Chapter 11, “Interviewing Children and Memories of Sexual Abuse”
Goodman, G. S. (2005). Wailing babies in her wake. American Psychologist, 60(8), 872–881.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.
Poole, D. A., Bruck, M., & Pipe, M. (2011). Forensic interviewing aids: Do props help children answer questions about touching? Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20(1), 11–15.
Wells, G. & Olson, E. (2003). Eyewitness testimony. Annual Review of Psychology, 54(1), 277–295.
Retrieved from the Walden Library databases.